Key points
- The World Health Organisation (WHO) has expressed concern over a new US executive order seeking to overhaul routine childhood vaccination recommendations.
- WHO Secretary-General, Tedros Ghebreyesus, reaffirmed the safety and importance of childhood vaccines.
- The US directive seeks to reduce the number of diseases covered by routine childhood immunisation recommendations from 18 to 11.
- The policy also proposes administering the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines separately rather than as a combined shot.
- WHO said the proposed changes are not consistent with decades of scientific evidence on vaccination schedules and dosage.
Main Story
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has expressed concern over a new executive order by US President Donald Trump seeking to overhaul the country’s recommended childhood vaccination schedule, while reaffirming the safety and importance of routine immunisation.
WHO Secretary-General Tedros Ghebreyesus, raised the concern in a statement on Wednesday, stressing that vaccination remains one of the most effective tools available to prevent serious childhood diseases.
Tedros acknowledged parents’ desire to protect their children, saying vaccines have played a critical role in making potentially deadly diseases preventable.
His comments followed an executive order signed by Trump on Monday directing a review of routine childhood immunisation recommendations.
Under the proposed Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations, the number of diseases covered by routine childhood immunisation is to be reduced from 18 to 11.
The policy also proposes separating the combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine into three individual vaccines, administered during separate medical appointments.
According to the US administration, the changes are intended to improve vaccine research and expand parental choice while ensuring compliance with constitutional and federal requirements concerning parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations and equal protection.
The Issues
WHO’s concern centres on whether the proposed changes are consistent with established scientific evidence on childhood vaccination.
Tedros said the proposed adjustments do not align with decades of evidence concerning when children should be vaccinated, how many doses are required and which vaccines can safely be administered together.
He stressed that vaccination recommendations are continuously reviewed as new evidence emerges globally.
The issue has wider public health implications because changes to vaccination schedules could affect immunisation coverage and leave some children vulnerable to preventable diseases if doses are delayed or omitted.
What’s Being Said
Tedros Ghebreyesus, WHO Secretary-General
Tedros reaffirmed WHO’s position on the safety of childhood vaccines, saying:
“The current evidence is unequivocal: vaccines – including the MMR vaccine – are safe and do not cause autism.”
He also cautioned against unnecessarily delaying or separating vaccinations.
“Delaying vaccines or separating doses unnecessarily does not make vaccination safer and can leave children unprotected.”
Tedros said national vaccination policies should take account of global evidence and recommendations, including those developed by WHO and reviewed by national experts.
He further warned against allowing political considerations to determine public health policy.
“Vaccination policy should be guided by rigorous, independent and transparent review of the best available science, not by political influence.”
What’s Next
The Trump administration’s revised vaccine recommendations are expected to undergo further implementation and review as US health authorities determine how the new policy will affect childhood immunisation programmes.
The development is likely to remain a subject of debate among health authorities, medical professionals, parents and policymakers, particularly regarding the proposed reduction in recommended vaccines and separation of the MMR shots.
WHO, meanwhile, is expected to continue advocating evidence-based immunisation policies and monitoring emerging scientific evidence on vaccine safety and effectiveness.
Bottom Line
The disagreement highlights a fundamental debate over who and what should guide vaccination policy.
While the Trump administration’s directive places greater emphasis on parental choice and a revised vaccination framework, WHO maintains that childhood immunisation schedules should be determined by rigorous scientific evidence and continuous expert review.
For WHO, the central concern is that changes to established vaccination schedules should not inadvertently leave children vulnerable to preventable diseases.
 has expressed concern over a new executive order by US President Donald Trump seeking ...){kind=link}