A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, has stated that the new charge filed against Ibraheem El-Zakzaky, leader of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN), and his wife, by the Kaduna state government was done hastily to prevent the couple from being released from custody.
The Islamic cleric and his spouse, Zeenat, were arraigned on an eight-count charge bordering on culpable homicide, unlawful assembly, and disruption of public peace.
They both pleaded not guilty to the charges preferred against them.
El-Zakzaky and his wife, Zeenat have been in custody since 2015 when members of the IMN, clashed with soldiers in Zaria, Kaduna.
The trial judge Gideon Kurada, on July 28, 2021, while upholding a no-case submission by the defendants, ordered the release of the couple.
In a twist of events, days after the court’s order granting the defendants their freedom, the Kaduna State Director of Public Prosecution, Dari Bayero, stated that the fresh charges filed by the state border on terrorism and treasonable felony against the state and the Federal Government.
Reacting to the recent development, Femi Falana, the lead counsel to El-Zakzaky in a statement on Sunday, stated that contrary to reports that the charge was filed after the court ordered the couple’s release, it had been “hurriedly filed in the federal high court holden at Kaduna on Tuesday, 26th July, in a desperate bid by the Kaduna State government to frustrate the release of the defendants from further incarceration”.
READ ALSO: MAN Says Poor Power Supply Affecting Businesses In Edo, Delta
“In other words, the new charge was maliciously filed when the Kaduna State Government anticipated that the ruling fixed for July 28 in respect our no case submission would succeed,” he said.
He stated that soon as the new charge was filed, “the bailiff of the federal high court was commanded to rush to the Kaduna correctional centre to serve same on the defendants”.
“But the defendants refused to accept service of the charge and directed the Bailiff to serve it on them through their Counsel. But for reasons best known to the Kaduna State Government, the charge was not served on the defence counsel,” Falana said.
“In apparent disregard of the epochal judgment of the Honourable Justice Gideon Kurada, the Kaduna State Government seeks to subject the defendants to trial under the Terrorism Prevention Act enacted in 2011 for offences that were committed as far back as 2008.
“But since the Kaduna State Government is not sure that the defendants would be convicted for terrorism, the Director of Public Prosecution, Mr. Bayero, has announced that an appeal would be filed at the Court of Appeal against the Ruling of the Honourable Justice Gideon Kadura.”
Falana said the new charge or filing of the appeal would have no effect on release of the defendants.
“Since the new charge has failed to achieve its oppressive objective of frustrating the release of the couple from further incarceration, we call on the Kaduna State Government to discontinue it without any delay,” he added.
